...any color you want, as long as its black.

Turkey describes itself as a secular nation. Its constitution claims to guarantee religious freedom and many Turks are proud that there is no state religion in Turkey. On the other hand, the government writes the weekly sermon for mosques across the country. National ID cards have a line for religious affiliation, which actually means religious heritage since it is determined at birth. The salaries of mosque officials are paid by the state.
Turkey's "secularity" is unique, if not questionable, and the issue of religious freedom is a particularly tense point. Turkey claims to protect religious freedom for its citizens, yet that freedom is often curtailed, especially for those who leave Islam for Christianity. The government harasses individuals who apply to change the religious status on their identity cards; petitions for churches to meet legally are often denied; and the government restricts or forbids the work of missionaries in the country. It seems to me that a government cannot claim to protect human rights while at the same time restricting evangelism and missions within its borders.
Since religious freedom is an essential component of human rights, people must be free to choose their religious beliefs. In order to be able to make choices with regard to religion there must be reliable access to accurate information about religion. In other words, unless a government is ensuring that its people have unrestricted access to this kind of information, then the government is failing to preserve human rights. And religious freedom isn't "actual" unless there are viable religious options being presented. And unless the truth of the gospel can be demonstrated by real people, Christianity can't be said to be "presented" adequately. So, when a Christian missionary goes to a Muslim country, he is actually an agent of religious freedom, and therefore, of human rights. If people do have a right to choose with regard to religion, then missionaries are necessary to actualizing that right.
Unless there are missionaries living out and presenting another religious option, there aren't any religious choices, so there isn't actually religious freedom. Evangelism is a human rights issue.
Comments